Skip to content

Fixing the Flyers, Step One: Dont Panic Over a Shortened Season

Apr 29, 2013, 2:30 PM EDT

http://www.the700level.com/images/1010789.jpg

It seems we’ve been on Peter Laviolette watch practically all
year, waiting for the inevitable to happen. The Flyers are notoriously tough on
head coaches. For instance when the Flyers began the 06-07 campaign with a
1-6-1 record, Ken Hitchcock was handed his walking papers that fast, while
general manager Bobby Clarke stepped down.

Coincidentally that was the only other occasion over the past
18 seasons where the Flyers missed the playoffs. This year the team started a similarly
awful 2-6, and from there we could never quite shake the feeling that Lavvy might
get canned at any moment, until Sunday that is. One day after the final horn
sounded, Paul Holmgren reiterated to reporters the message that he stuck to all
along: this head coach will return.

“Peter Laviolette is the coach,” Holmgren said. “I don’t
know where all this crap came from.”

“Our team played hard until the end,” he said. “Peter is a
strong motivator and a strong tactician. I expect him to lead our team back into
the playoffs next year.”

That doesn’t mean Laviolette won’t be looking over his
shoulder when the Flyers resume their quest for the Cup come October. While you
get the sense there is some legitimate support for the man inside the front
office, it might have as much to do with the fact that Lavvy will only be embarking
on the two-year extension he signed just this last summer, or in other words
saving face.

Still, keeping Laviolette on board (for now) – not to
mention Homer – is also the smart decision, primarily because it’s not the one
being made out of panic. In an 82-game season, eight games represent less than
10% of the schedule. In 2013, eight games was 1/6 of the slate.

Maybe this is the sign of an organization that concedes a
condensed 48-game season is not necessarily a complete representation of where
their hockey club stands today.

More quirks of a 48-game schedule

Make no mistake, nobody is trying to “blame” the shortened
season for the Flyers’ woes. Everyone had to play under the same conditions,
and the guys in Orange & Black simply were not good enough. Their 5-on-5
scoring differential ranked 25th in the NHL, the defense was plagued by constant
complete breakdowns throughout, and for much of the way there was essentially one
goaltender on the roster.

In a normal season though, eight games would not so heavily influence
the final outcome. In a normal season, the Flyers would be six points out of a
playoff spot with 34 contests left to play. And in a normal season, they are
just hitting their stride.

Don’t look now, but Lavvy’s squad started to turn the corner toward the end. Philly won six of their last seven games, and are 10-5 dating back to March 30. At the 48-game mark of an 82-game season, the Flyers would
widely be considered in the midst of their playoff push.

Instead, in a 48-game season every little misstep gets
magnified. It took 16 games, or 1/3 of the season, to figure out Claude Giroux
should be paired with Jakub Voracek. It took until the April 3 trade deadline
to add a truly viable backup netminder in Steve Mason, at which point Ilya Bryzgalov had
played in 22 games in a row – nearly half of the schedule.

Where would they be
if either of those changes had been made in January?

Some things just didn’t fall their way

Then there is the matter of 262 man games being lost to injury,
2nd-most in the NHL by some counts, and also more than the Flyers endured in two
of the previous three full seasons (240 in 10-11, 205 in 09-10). Yes, that is an
excuse. Every team has to deal with injuries. But still, that averages out to roughly
five scratches per game – four even if Chris Pronger is removed from the
equation.

As a result the Flyers were forced to lean heavily on young players. By the end of the season, they had been relying on major contributions from as many as a dozen players 25-years-old
or younger, many of whom were in their first or second NHL seasons. Some of them did not enjoy the growth that the team was
counting on to be successful this year, most notably Brayden Schenn and Sean Couturier.

Remarkably that was yet another area where the Flyers did
not panic. Couturier in particular was linked in potential deals with San Jose
and Ottawa for Ryane Clowe and Ben Bishop respectively. However, Homer was not willing
to give up on the talented 20 year old, even though there was almost an
expectation from fans and observers that a struggling young player would be
moved for immediate help.

2013 was a disappointing hockey season for Philadelphia, one
that exposed some definite issues that need to be addressed. However, 48 games do
not indicate first- and second-year players have hit a wall, and therefore the Flyers need to be reinvented yet again. The actions of the front
office suggest they agree.

So far at least.

Previously: Positive Takeaways from a Lost Flyers Season

  1. john procopi - May 16, 2013 at 11:07 PM

    First of all The Flyers haven’t won anything in 38 years so counseling patience makes no sense .Second ,talking about the Flyers front office like they have a clue is equally silly. Again they haven’t won in 38 years-these bozo’s are clueless.

    Flyers main problem is that the fans continue to support this braindead locked in the 70′s brainless organization.Boycott the bums-cost the billionaire owners some money and then you might see a commitment to winning. Right now these Jackals simply print money and believe in Barnums ” a sucker (ie Flyer fan) is born every minute

    Reply
    • willh888 - May 17, 2013 at 7:56 AM

      you like.. really care about brains

      Reply
  2. Dan - May 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM

    For the large part I agree with this article. Except in the case of Paul Holmgren who should be fired. He has mismanaged this team from the very beginning. He trades the so-called “bad seeds” in Richards and Carter only to bring in a far bigger headache in Bryzgalov. He completely gave up on Bobrovsky and undersold JVR (should’ve gotten more than just Schenn straight up). He allowed Jagr and Carle to bounce trying to sign Parise and Suter who pretty much said they would not go to either: a Devils rival or the Eastern conference. The 2010 and 2011 teams should have been Cup winners but Holmgren’s inability to bring in a goaltender cost them in both playoff runs. He signed a high risk contract with Chris Pronger (35+ contracts that go over 3 years are extremely poor judgment calls) and instead of getting a goaltender he trades for Meszaros to play on the third defensive pairing. And let’s not even go into the whole how he treated trading Gagne and replacing him with Zherdev fiasco.

    Reply

(email will not be published)