Skip to content

Is It Really Just Sandberg? Exploring Other Explanations for the Phils’ Recent Hot Streak

Aug 27, 2013, 2:15 PM EDT

MLB: Los Angeles Dodgers at Philadelphia Phillies

If you haven’t noticed, or if you’d given up following weeks or months ago, the Phillies have won seven of their last nine games. For a good or even average team, this would only be slightly notable, but before this stretch, the Phils had won just seven of their last 28 games–and even that began with a three-game winning streak–so a patch of games this good feels almost like an entire season turning around.

A reversal of fortunes like this requires some kind of over-arcing explanation, and the obvious one in this case would be the big change the Phillies made up top, replacing longtime manager Charlie Manuel with third-base coach Ryne Sandberg. Asked about whether it’s Sanbderg making the difference, last night’s winning pitcher Cliff Lee says sorta, not really. Jim Salisbury of CSN got the quote:

We’re grinding it out a little more, just playing hard from the start to the finish, basic execution…I’ve said that from the very beginning — if we just execute and play fundamental baseball we can beat anyone. We’ve started doing that in the last week and a half or so and the results are showing.

I’m not a guy who thinks the manager wins or loses games for us. I don’t think it was Charlie’s fault that we lost, and I don’t think it’s Sandberg that’s winning it for us, to be honest with you. But I think he has instilled more of let’s-get-after-it frame of mind and that’s what we’re doing.

But it’s the guys that are going out there and getting the outs and making the plays and swinging the bats that’s getting it done. I feel like his frame of mind and what he expects has influenced that and it’s up to us to buy into it and lay it out and we’ve definitely done a better job with that, just getting after it and playing hard and never giving up and trying to execute and play fundamental baseball. That’s how we’ve won the last 10 days.

So is it really Sandberg making the difference? An improvement in fundamentals? Let’s look at some other explanations for how the Phillies have actually managed to win some games recently.

  • They’ve been facing some crappier competition. Let’s remember that as many games as the Phillies lost recently, they lost most of ‘em to some pretty damn good teams. Three to the Cardinals, three to the Tigers, three to the Braves, three to the Nats, two to the Dodgers–and all of ‘em (except probably the underperforming Nats) are headed to the postseason. Now, the Phillies have had the benefit of playing three against the reeling Rockies, three against the mostly mediocre Diamondbacks, and now a series against the injury-decimated Mets. Opponents matter, and you can expect the hot streak to likely continue through three against the rebuilding Cubs after our last two at Citi.
  • They’ve been getting pretty lucky. They may be on a 7-2 run, but over those nine games, they’ve only managed to cumulatively outscore opponents 42-39. Remarkably, all but one of those seven victories were by just one run, including those three straight walk-off victories that almost managed to make people excited about Phillies baseball again. You could say that winning in those games comes down to execution and fundamentals, like Cliff posits, but luck also plays a big part with margins of victory so small–a beneficial call here or there, a grounder that finds its way up the middle, a throw that sails a foot or two wide. Play enough games in a season and eventually you’ll lose three or four straight by one run, too, and it won’t just be because the other team executed better, either.
  • They’ve been getting some starting pitching. The Phils have gotten quality starts in six of their last nine games–outings that last at least six innings without allowing more than three runs–and they’ve won all six. After some minor post-All-Star struggles, Cliff Lee appears to have rounded back into form, going seven innings or more in his last three starts and getting his first win since early July with his eight-inning, five-hit, one-walk and seven-strikeout performance last night against the Mets. Cole Hamels has been similarly solid, also going at least seven in each of his last three, and pitching his first CG victory of the season against the Braves a couple weeks ago. If Roy Halladay can continue on the comeback trail after his rocky return (albeit in a win) against the Diamondbacks, we might actually have a pretty decent top three for our pitching rotation again.
  • They’ve been getting some relief pitching, too. The unspoken hero of the recent Phils’ hot streak has been closer Jonathan Papelbon, who has regained his early-season consistency over his last six appearances, giving up zero runs, zero walks and only four hits over the span, picking up two saves and two wins in the process. Far more surprising, however, has been the contribution of lefty reliever Jake Diekman, who as Salisbury points out in that same CSN article, has gone scoreless over his last seven appearances, also with zero walks and four hits, but with an impressive 12 strikeouts over that period. We’d been waiting all year for someone from our crappy bullpen to step up into dependability, and at long last–and far too late–it looks like Diekman actually has a shot of being that guy.
  • Their catcher is hitting again. Darin Ruf has been getting most of the attention recently for his hot August, and rightly so–The Babe has hit nine homers in the month, second-most in the majors to some random guy in Detroit, and now has as many homers on the season as Ryan Howard in about half the games. But have you been paying attention to what Carlos Ruiz has been doing at the same time? After a disconcertingly slow start to the season after his return from suspension and then injury, Chooch has hit at a sparkling clip .347/.373/.556 this month–numbers which spike to .455/.471/.758 (!!) if you only include the team’s last nine games. It was easy to forget how huge a part of this offense Ruiz used to be when he was hitting like Humberto Quintero, but now that he’s back in the saddle, it’s once again impossible to imagine the lineup without him somewhere near the middle.

As always in baseball, it’s impossible to quantify just how much the manager helps–are the Phillies winning more because they’re focused and excited and playing together again, or are they focused and excited and playing together again because they’re winning more? But regardless of how much Ryne Sandberg’s installment as manager has helped the team lately, there are some more easily isolated factors that have been just as important, if not more, to their recent winning ways. Hopefully they stick around to next year, regardless of whether or not Sandberg does.

  1. JD - Aug 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM

    To me, along with the teams they’ve been playing the and a little bit of luck, it’s the change of scenery with a new skipper and his “team-first” mentality. Love his new rule of the entire team being out there for the National Anthem (http://www.csnphilly.com/sportsnetPhiladelphia/search/v/79858449/sandberg-on-having-everyone-present-for-the-national-anthem.htm). That and how he’s pulled aside the veterans (i.e., Rollins, Lee, Utley) to take the initiative and be there to help out the newer guys. It’s the team stuff that they’ve gotten away from which has always been their strong suit.

    I think that a lot of these guys know they’ve been taking things easy and have been pretty laid back about how they go about getting things done. Sandberg’s just tightened up the laces and the Phils are responding.

    I hope he’s around for next year when given a fresh start on a season.

    Reply
  2. Hiccup - Aug 27, 2013 at 3:56 PM

    There is no way to predict how things would be if Manual was still skipper. It is what it is and right now we have a new manager who is leading a team that is winning games. Let’s sit back and enjoy. Go Phillies!
    P.S., I miss you Charlie, I hope you get to manage another team like the Nationals; it sure would make it interesting.

    Reply
  3. Ez - Aug 27, 2013 at 4:28 PM

    Since the start of the second half of the season (July 19th)…

    In 24 games under Charlie Manuel, the Phillies had 48 walks.

    So far, in 11 games under Ryne Sandberg, the Phillies have 41 walks.

    Just sayin’.

    Reply
    • Scott - Aug 28, 2013 at 5:50 AM

      They’ve also been shut out 3 out of 12 games, while with Charlie it was 10 out of 120. Just sayin’

      Reply
      • Ez - Aug 28, 2013 at 10:21 PM

        Two of them were to the Dodgers, idiot.

        Also, Sandberg has 8 wins so far, while Cholly had 5 this second half.

        Just sayin’.

  4. Mike - Aug 27, 2013 at 5:50 PM

    It couldn’t be the manager because that would mean St Charles of West Virginee would be partly to blame for the team faltering. That is just not acceptable.

    They are more disciplined at the plate and the change probably helped them refocus a bit. In the long term they’re at best a .500 team, and after the high of a manager change they’ll settle back to their talent level.

    Reply
    • Hiccup - Aug 27, 2013 at 10:12 PM

      Mets 5, Phillies zero. How prophetic! The team is settling back to their old ways. But there is no way they will be a .500 team this year; that would take quite a few wins.

      Reply
      • Mike - Aug 28, 2013 at 6:54 AM

        No, there not getting to .500 and that wasn’t what I said. Over the long term with Chaz or Ryne they’d be at best .500. See those words “at best”.

    • Hiccup - Aug 28, 2013 at 2:09 PM

      They are a long way from being a .500 team at best, I agree with your points and I didn’t mean to offend, I guess I was more upset by the fact that the Phillies got blanked again while showing so little disciplin at the plate, just like in the good ole’ days when Uncle Charlie was the skipper.

      Reply
  5. mohotta - Aug 27, 2013 at 6:10 PM

    Sandberg isn’t 3rd base coach any more – that may have helped a little bit too.

    Reply
  6. charlie - Aug 27, 2013 at 9:51 PM

    Did he just scare them all?

    Is it just me or does Sandberg look like Robert Quarles?

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9a/Neal_McDonough_2009.jpg/220px-Neal_McDonough_2009.jpg

    Reply
  7. Tony - Aug 28, 2013 at 12:37 PM

    While the Phils have won some games recently, the bigger concern overall is the lack of hitting and their inability to score runs or even threaten on some nights, like last nite’s 5-nothing loss.

    If you look at their runs scored, the Phils have 498 which would give them approximately 600 by end of year.
    In 08, 09 and 2010 they scored 800 plus runs.

    This club doesn’t hit well enough, they don’t walk enough, they waste at bats and very rarely are 3 or 4 phils hot at the same time. Most games they don’t even hit the ball hard, lots of soft ground balls and off balance swings.

    Sandberg has his work cut out for him with this lineup. What happens next year if Ruf hits more homers than Howard and Ryan struggles again. Can Sandberg help Rollins become something better than the 240 hitter he has become?

    The Phils could have Cliff Lee, Cole Hamels, Matt Harvey and Clayton Kershaw and they’d lose half their games because they don’t hit. We don’t have one player hitting 300 or even close.

    The red sox, cards and tigers lineups are full of 300 hitters. Oakland and Pittsburgh with less than 1/3 the phils are spending are much better than the product we have on the field spending 170M. Amaro should be fired and if Montgomery won’t do, he should go to.

    Reply

(email will not be published)